6,000 or 4.65 Billion Years?

In the 1600s, according to accurate calculations using the Bible, Archbishop James Ussher proposed Earth was created at 6 PM on October 22nd, 4004 BC. That is why many people still believe the Earth is 6000 years old. But he missed it by only 4,649,994,000 years. 
I did my own Bible calculations by counting the generations from Adam to Jesus (79 generations) according to Luke. According to Mathew, there are 14 generations from Abraham to David, and there are 24 generations from David to Jesus. Considering a generation is 25 to 30 years, from Adam to Jesus is 2370 years give or take maybe a little more considering in the old testament, miraculously, people lived to 930 years and gave birth at the age of 600 years! So, Human life on earth would have started around 2370+2018= 4388 years ago. You may add 6 days to that since Adam was created on day 6.
Anyway, In the 19th century, the Geologists used the sedimentations to recalculated the earth's age, and they guessed the earth is a few million years old. Now, by calculating the half-life of the radioactive decay of Uranium to lead in meteoroids and ancient rocks, the earth is estimated to be 4.65 Billion years old

Gusse who?

Gusse who?
He was a savior born of a virgin on December 25th
His birth was witnessed by shepherds and magi
His witnesses followed the east star
He was gifted Gold, Frankincense, and the Mur
He had 12 disciples He performed miracles like healing the sick and raising the dead
He was baptized, practiced Eucharist communion with bread and wine
He gave salvation through the blood
He was killed rose from death and ascended to heaven
His symbol is the cross and his worship day is Sunday
He is depicted with the solar corona halo behind his head
He is referred to as "The Truth, the light, the word"
I bet you are wrong
It is Mythra The God Sun
He was followed from 1000 BC to 500 AD
He was worshiped by a majority of people of the Roman Empire before and during early Christianity.

Freedom of speach for the Muslims only

This is not just an opinion this is the truthful fact. 
In response to a Muslim female wearing a headscarf talking  to Christian audience about fearing Muslims

Dear Amal, If your core Islamic beliefs did not call for Jihad, blowing up people, flying planes into buildings, and rapping or killing the non-Muslims, none would have been scared of you. 

If anyone has any knowledge of the Islamic teachings, he or she knows your scarf or the beard on your brother's face is not a fashion statement, but It is a religious statement. You headscarf is a statement saying I am a fundamental Muslim and I follow the Islamic rolls even in the way I dress or the way I shave my facial hair. 

If you really follow The Islamic rolls to that extent, then you most probably justify killing the infidels, or you would be considered a "hypocrite" according to Islam, Hadeeth, and Quran unless you are practicing "Teqiia." 

Teqiia is; The prophet adviced the Muslims to hid the faith and pretend not to practice fundamental Islam when it is not safe. However, when it is safe enough, the Muslims are allowed to go back and practice the real radical Islam. 

If we have an ounce of intelligence, we ought to be afraid of who looks like you or your brother. It could be too late if we did not suspect one Muslim who wants to kill us among a 100 who don't. 

Of course, you can say what you want to say in a free country to a Christian audience! But what will happen if a Christian girl talks about being a Christian in a Muslim country to a Muslim audience in a moderate a country like Egypt for example? 
For a fact she will be called an infidel whore, beaten, raped, and most probably killed too. 

So please stop being a wolf blaming the rabbit. 

5 Religious Answers to Any Dilemma in a Holy Book

When you do ask a religious person a question about a dilemma in a sacred text, you may get one of 5 types of answers.

• An illiterate of the text might deny the existence of the verse. Which means you made it up and you are lying! i.e., No answer!
• A Literalist might say "Who am I to question the word of God? God works in mysterious ways!" Which means it is what it is, go away! i.e., No answer!
• A Non-literalist might say "It says this, but it really means that" "Don't take it literally or out of context" Which means just change the meaning to something else different from what it really is. i.e., No answer!
• A priest might say "in our faith, we don't have just scripture, but we have dogma which is a code of beliefs which is the divine information which will explain any other sort of thing which may come up in scripture" which is a very nonspecific general statement that doesn't answer the question which means you will not get it because you don't have dogma. i.e., No answer!

• A rabbi might say "Somebody screwed up!" which means so what? I don't care! i.e., Still No answer! 5 different unrelated contradicting nonanswers to the same question.

Faith is to believe without evidence.
Blind faith is to believe in spite of evidence of the opposite.
Science is to question and examine everything and to observe evidence. This is why science and faith will never agree.  

The religious often state you can't question God or question what made God. This is the opposite of the scientific principles. You can never have a scientific discussion based on You can’t ask specific questions!

The bible old and new testaments, as well as the Quran, are full of flat wrong scientific facts. For hundreds of years, apologists have been trying so hard to modify the texts to agree with the modern scientific events and discoveries, but they always fail.

Religions usually explain the unknown by divine intervention and miracles. In science, there are no miracles but there is always an explanation for any phenomenon and if there is none we say we don't know yet.

It is challenging to try to convince me that a fact is not a fact, or to accept wrong statements like;

"the earth is flat."

"the stars will fall on earth" or

"18 million animals fit in a ship for several months."

The justification is always one of the 5 nonsense answers I mentioned above.  If you bring factual evidence, I will be convinced by your point whatever it is. We can talk about any issue one by one.

23 Signs of Lying

The Most dangerous liars are those who believe they are telling the truth.

Here Are 23 Signs of Lying

1-Freez when asked the question 

2-Repeat the question when asked the question

3-Answer the questions with more questions 

4-Laugh it off when asked the question 

5-Avoid answering the question

6-Give Vague answers to the question

7-Exaggerate emotions in response to the question

8-Exaggerate honesty when asked the question

9-Sympathize with you when asked the question 

10-Express Hostility in response to the question 

Facial expressions 

11-Stiff facial expression, 

12-Coughing or frequent Swallowing saliva, 

13-No eye contact or too much Eye contact, 

14-Eye moving side to side, 

15-Eye looking to the top right/left, 

16-Looking down and shaking head, 

17-Smiling with the face, Not the eyes, 

18-Eyes do not get smaller when smiling, 

19-Asymmetrical face expression 

20-Put Hand or palm on the Forehead, Face or Neck, 

21-Scratch forehead, Eyelids, Nose or Earlobe, 

22-Put Fingers in the Mouth, 

23-Biting the Lip. 

Masters Degree in Camel Urology

Masters Degree in Camel Urology
It is really debatable in the Islamic world if camel urine cures diseases because some Muslimes were cured after they drank it according to Sahih Bukhari. There are 12 Confirmed true Hadith about drinking Camel urine as medicine in Sahih Bukhari. You may easily find it here, just search the word "urine" 

https://www.sahih-bukhari.com/Pages/results.phpFor example Volume 8, Book 82, Number 794 :
Narrated by Anas
Some people from the tribe of 'Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink, their milk and urine (as a medicine). They did so, and after they had recovered from their ailment (became healthy) they turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away. The Prophet sent (some people) in their pursuit and so they were (caught and) brought, and the Prophets ordered that their hands and legs should be cut off and that their eyes should be branded with heated pieces of iron, and that their cut hands and legs should not be cauterized, till they die.

Sahih Bukhari: Read, Study, Search Online

Read Online the English Translation of Sahih Bukhari, one of the most authentic collections of the Islamic Sunnah. Thousands of Hadiths with a search engine...

SAHIH-BUKHARI.COM

Microwave Killed the Stove

Microwave Killed the Stove
Over a million years ago, our ancestors spent an average of 8 hours a day chewing on raw food. “Archaeologists Find Earliest Evidence of Humans Cooking With Fire” by Kenneth Miller, it was recently discovered Homo Erectus was our first ancestor to use fire to cook food. Homo Erectus started cooking after they discovered when food goes through the fire, it tastes better and becomes easier and faster to chew.

Subsequently, Homo Erectus developed smaller jaw, mastication muscles, and smaller teeth which made extra room in the skull for the brain to grow larger. The Jaw-dropping theory of human evolution is suggested by Michael Hopkin’s article, “Did mankind trade chewing power for a bigger brain?” Increased calorie and nutrition intake lead to a massive increase in the size of the human brain and intelligence.

Soon humans went from wood fire to gas stove fire to microwave cooking. When humans spent less time eating and became smarter, they had more time to socialize, communicate and build civilization. In modern life, cooking took a different form especially with the invention of the surface gas stove instead of cooking on fire pits. Every house had a stove for cooking multiple items or dishes at the same time. Cooking was mainly the job of the housewives since men worked and provided.

By the 1970s, most men and women worked and had less time for cooking. In the mid-1970s, the microwave became a very popular house appliance, stated Amanda Davis in her Perspective “A History of the Microwave Oven”. It was an evolutionary appliance for fast cooking and heating. The microwave almost replaced the stove, like the stove replaced cooking by pit fire. The microwave uses electricity generated heat waves which cooks food instantaneously and is able to prepare a prepackaged or homemade meal in 1-5 minutes instead of over 1 hour. It has become an essential cooking device for busy families with both parents working.

I think the microwave helped individuals to achieve independence from each other. A teenager can leave his family to live alone since he can prepare his or her meals in minutes instead of depending on his mother’s cooking. A person can live in a tiny apartment with almost no kitchen and still prepares his meals using just a bowl, a spoon, and a microwave. In the past, a major section of the house had to be a big enough kitchen to contain a big cooking stove and a lot of kitchen utilities. Now there is almost no more need for such space or to spend money to buy such pieces of equipment.

The microwave had an impact on the development of the society and the independence of its individuals. It provided the convenience of preparing food extremely easier and faster which saved more time for people to work, live, and socialize. However, it may have had a slightly negative effect on the society’s structure since too much independence may lead to less bonding and weakening of family ties.

Works Cited Davis, Amanda. “A History of the Microwave Oven.” the institute.ieee.org. IEEE. 2 May 2016. Web. 15 Sep. 2017. Hopkin, Michael. “Jaw-dropping theory of human evolution: Did mankind trade chewing power for a bigger brain?” nature.com. Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature., 25 Mar. 2004. Web. 15 Sep. 2017. Miller, Kenneth. “Archaeologists Find Earliest Evidence of Humans Cooking With Fire.” discovermagazine.com. Kalmbach Publishing CO. 17 Dec. 2013. Web. 15 Sep. 2017.